Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Here we present a table summarizing the Fleiss’ kappa results. The Fleiss’ Kappa was calculated as a way to measure the degree of agreement between four annotators who evaluated the relevance of a set of documents (15 evaluation articles) regarding its corresponding “reference article”. The table contains 7 columns, the first one presents the topics, 8 in total. The second column shows the “reference articles”, represented by their PubMed-ID and organized by topic. The third column shows the Fleiss’ Kappa results. The fourth column shows the interpretation of the Fleiss' Kappa results being: i) “Poor” results <0.20, ii) “Fair” results within 0.21 - 0.40, and iii) “Moderate” results within 0.41 - 0.60. The fifth column shows the PubMed-IDs of evaluation articles rated by the four annotators as “Relevant” regarding its corresponding “reference article”. The sixth column shows the PubMed-IDs of evaluation articles rated by the four annotators as “Partially relevant” regarding its corresponding “reference article”. The seventh column shows the PubMed-IDs of evaluation articles rated by the four annotators as “Non-relevant” regarding its corresponding “reference article”. Acknowledgements This work is part of the STELLA project funded by DFG (project no. 407518790). This work was supported by the BMBF-funded de.NBI Cloud within the German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (de.NBI) (031A532B, 031A533A, 031A533B, 031A534A, 031A535A, 031A537A, 031A537B, 031A537C, 031A537D, 031A538A).
Fleiss kappa, Inter-annotator agreement
Fleiss kappa, Inter-annotator agreement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 18 | |
| downloads | 14 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts