Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In the process of interpreting an electrocardiogram (ECG) the mean electrical axis of the heart needs to be determined. In veterinary electrocardiography the mean electrical axis (MEA) is figured in the frontal plane and can be calculated by using several different ways. In this study, values of the MEA, calculated by two methods (the isoelectric lead method and the vector method), were compared. The aim of this study is to establish whether different methods give different values for MEA. German shepherd dogs of different age, presenting in sinus rhythm, were used in the study. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded while the dogs were in standard position (right lateral recumbency). The determination of mean electrical axis were performed by examining the QRS complexes in each of the peripheral leads (I, II, III, avR, aVL, aVF). Mean values of the MEA were calculated by two methods were ¯x1 = 76,50º ± 19,83 i ¯x2 = 80,17º ± 11,44. Values of the MEA determined by two methods were not statistically different (p = 0,384). These results show that value of the MEA in healthy dogs is not under significant influence of the method chosen for calculation.
mean electrical axis, calculation, German Shepherd dogs
mean electrical axis, calculation, German Shepherd dogs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 1 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts