Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explain various types of data collection instruments, and available techniques for checking the calibration, validity, and reliability of the data collection instrument, in turn, guiding Ph.D. scholars to use a well-calibrated, valid, and reliable data collection instrument to ensure high-quality of research output. Design/Methodology/Approach: Postmodernism philosophical paradigm; Inductive research approach; Observation data collection method; Longitudinal data collection time frame; Qualitative data analysis. Findings/Result: As long as the Ph.D. scholars can understand the existing research data collection instruments and realize the need for the development of a new instrument and make mindful choices of instruments in addition to checking their calibration, validity, and reliability before collecting the research data to answer their research question they will be able to determine (on their own) data analysis techniques and appropriate statistical techniques in subsequent stages of the doctoral-level research process to comfortably claim their research findings. Originality/Value: There is a vast literature about research data collection instruments and procedures to check their calibration, validity, and reliability. However, only a few have explained them together comprehensively which is conceivable to Ph.D. scholars. In this article, we have attempted to briefly explain various types of data collection instruments, and available techniques for checking the calibration, validity, and reliability of the data collection instrument. Paper Type: Conceptual.
Coursework, Research Methodology, Instrument Development, Research Process, Instrument Adaption, Ph.D., Face Validity, Postmodernism, Human Instrument, Construct Validity, PhD, Content Validity, Inter-rater Reliability, Split-half Reliability, Reliability, Data Collection Instrument, Research Design, Parallel Forms Reliability, Instrument Adoption, Calibration, Criterion Validity, Doctoral Research, Test-retest Reliability, Internal Consistency Reliability
Coursework, Research Methodology, Instrument Development, Research Process, Instrument Adaption, Ph.D., Face Validity, Postmodernism, Human Instrument, Construct Validity, PhD, Content Validity, Inter-rater Reliability, Split-half Reliability, Reliability, Data Collection Instrument, Research Design, Parallel Forms Reliability, Instrument Adoption, Calibration, Criterion Validity, Doctoral Research, Test-retest Reliability, Internal Consistency Reliability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 41 | |
| downloads | 80 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts