Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The Jupyter Notebooks in this deposit was originally used for the "ESTEEM3 Workshop: Electron diffraction for solving engineering problems" workshop held at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) in Trondheim 21.-23. June 2022. The aim of these notebooks is to give an introduction on how to work with very large scanning electron diffraction (SED) datasets acquired using a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), assuming no prior experience with Python, HyperSpy, pyXem or Jupyter Notebooks. There are 5 notebooks included, which are intended to be done in order, starting with 01: 01_using_jupyter_notebooks: this gives an introduction on the Jupyter Notebook format itself, and how to use JupyterLab 02_working_with_diffraction_data: how to work with 4-dimensional scanning electron diffraction data, utilizing HyperSpy's lazy functionality to explore and process large datasets 03_centering_electron_beam: how to correct for the movement of the direct beam 04_advanced_data_processing_using_map: how to write custom functions for processing your data, by using HyperSpy's map functionality. Here by showing how different amorphous materials can be found in a SED dataset 05_dask_and_chunking: explores dataset chunking, which is an important concept when working with these large datasets Prerequisites To use these, you need to have JupyterLab, HyperSpy, and pyXem installed. The easiest way to do this, is to use the HyperSpy Bundle: https://hyperspy.org/hyperspy-doc/current/user_guide/install.html These Jupyter Notebooks were made and tested using: hyperspy 1.7.1 hyperspy-gui-traitsui 1.5.2 hyperspy-gui-ipywidgets 1.5.0 pyxem 0.14.2 jupyterlab 3.4.2 However, they're likely to work with newer versions of these modules. Datasets There are three datasets from two different samples used in these notebooks. These are compressed in a 7zip-file, and needs to be extracted before they can be used with the notebooks. You might need install the open source 7zip software to extract this: Scanning Electron Diffraction from a Central Processing Unit (CPU), prepared for TEM using Focused Ion Beam (FIB) (cpu_sample_sped.zspy, cpu_sample_sped_small.hspy) Scanning Electron Diffraction from a permalloy film deposited on a SiN TEM grid, then irradiated by Ga-ions using a FIB (nanocrystalline_dscan.zspy) The large files are (cpu_sample_sped.zspy, nanocrystalline_dscan.zspy) are stored in the `zspy` format http://hyperspy.org/hyperspy-doc/current/user_guide/io.html#zspy-hyperspy-s-zarr-specification, which is HyperSpy's specification of the Zarr format https://zarr.readthedocs.io/en/stable/. Compared to the previous "standard" way of storing HyperSpy data, which was `hspy` (HDF5), `zspy` is much faster to both read and write. Note Not all the Jupyter Notebooks used in the "ESTEEM3 Workshop: Electron diffraction for solving engineering problems" is included in this deposit. This deposit includes the introductory ones presented by Magnus Nord.
The Research Council of Norway is acknowledged for partially funding the creation of these Jupyter Notebook via the InCoMa project (Project number: 315475). The Research Council of Norway is also acknowledged for funding for the Norwegian Micro- and Nano-Fabrication Facility, NorFab (295864), specifically NTNU Nanolab, which had the Focused Ion Beam used to either prepare or make the samples. The Research Council of Norway is also acknowledged for funding for the Norwegian Center for Transmission Electron Microscopy, NORTEM (197405), which was used to acquire all the datasets.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 20 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts