Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Reports of Swiss court rulings are anonymous to protect the privacy of involved subjects. The Swiss national research project ”Open Justice vs. Privacy” strives to automate re-identification of anonymous reports of court rulings using natural language processing. The achievement of this goal requires a database of court decision related documents. So far, despite the increasing amount and availability of data, no data sets of external documents related to Swiss federal court rulings have been collected and processed. This research project aims to provide a database of court decision related documents from five promising online data sources. In a second step, the sources were analyzed and the documents along with the metadata provided were scraped. After being structured in a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) format, the results were analyzed in the context of the overarching research project and quantitatively evaluated by examining the text similarity of the resulting data and the court rulings.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts