Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1126/science.abq6740 , 10.5281/zenodo.7302777 , 10.5281/zenodo.7302776 , 10.5281/zenodo.7922658
pmid: 36480599
pmc: PMC9910357
doi: 10.1126/science.abq6740 , 10.5281/zenodo.7302777 , 10.5281/zenodo.7302776 , 10.5281/zenodo.7922658
pmid: 36480599
pmc: PMC9910357
Learning to predict rewards based on environmental cues is essential for survival. It is believed that animals learn to predict rewards by updating predictions whenever the outcome deviates from expectations, and that such reward prediction errors (RPEs) are signaled by the mesolimbic dopamine system—a key controller of learning. However, instead of learning prospective predictions from RPEs, animals can infer predictions by learning the retrospective cause of rewards. Hence, whether mesolimbic dopamine instead conveys a causal associative signal that sometimes resembles RPE remains unknown. We developed an algorithm for retrospective causal learning and found that mesolimbic dopamine release conveys causal associations but not RPE, thereby challenging the dominant theory of reward learning. Our results reshape the conceptual and biological framework for associative learning.
General Science & Technology, Dopamine, Neurosciences, Association Learning, Bioengineering, Associative Learning, Basic Behavioral and Social Science, Reinforcement Learning, Mice, Reward, Behavioral and Social Science, Limbic System, Animals, Mental health, Cues
General Science & Technology, Dopamine, Neurosciences, Association Learning, Bioengineering, Associative Learning, Basic Behavioral and Social Science, Reinforcement Learning, Mice, Reward, Behavioral and Social Science, Limbic System, Animals, Mental health, Cues
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 171 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
| views | 57 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts