Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

An Audibility Model of the Bone Conduction Device during Headband Trial in Single-sided Deaf Subjects.

Authors: Guido Cattani; Rhebergen, Koenraad S.; Smit, Adriana L.;

An Audibility Model of the Bone Conduction Device during Headband Trial in Single-sided Deaf Subjects.

Abstract

Code of the study Available in GitHub Related Data zenodo.7295445 Abstract Objective Modelling the head-shadow-effect compensation and speech intelligibility outcomes, we studied the benefits of fitting a bone conduction device (BCD) during the headband trial in single-sided deafened (SSD) subjects. Design The participants’ BCD settings were retrospectively used for measurements on the skull simulator. The sensation levels of the Bone-Conduction and Air-Conduction sound paths were compared, modelling three spatial conditions with the speech in quiet. When the difference between sensation levels was equivalent or greater than zero, this was scored as full head-shadow-effect compensation. We calculated the phoneme score using the Speech Intelligibility Index for the three conditions in quiet and seven in noise. Study sample Data from eighty-five SSD adults fitted with a BCD during the headband trial. Results According to our model, most subjects did not achieve a full head-shadow-effect compensation with the signal at the BCD side and in front. The modelled speech intelligibility in the quiet condition did not improve with the transcutaneous BCD compared with the unaided condition. In noise, we found a slight improvement in some specific conditions and minimal worsening in others. Conclusions Based on an audibility model, this study challenges the fundamentals of a trial period with a transcutaneous BCD in SSD subjects. About this release The code is provided in 2 different flavors: .ipynb and .html. If you want just to consult the code, it is best to use the html format. The html files provide also results, tables, and graphs. If you want to run the code, you have to use the ipynb files in the jupyter notebook (https://jupyter.org). Beside python and R, you will need different libraries. See the list "Code_packages_version". For this purpose, you may consider the installation of the anaconda platform (https://www.anaconda.com). To get the code working properly, you have to set the input and output file paths according to your operating system and map tree. The code is written for use with xslx files. If you like to use csv files, you have to adapt the code. Software & Libraries Version The code works fine with the following versions: Python 3.8.12, Matplotlib 3.5.1, Numpy 1.20.3, Pandas 1.4.1, Pillow (PIL) 9.0.1, Scipy 1.7.3, Seeborn 0.11.2, R 3.6.3.

This project is related to: Peters, J. P., van Zon, A., Smit, A. L., van Zanten, G. A., de Wit, G. A., Stegeman, I., Grolman, W. (2015). CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, 15(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12901-015-0016-y

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Hearing Aids, Speech Perception, Humans, Audibility, Audiology, Hearing Loss, Unilateral, Bone Conduction, BCD

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 11
  • 11
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
11
Related to Research communities