Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The announcement by the Chinese authorities in early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 was likely from animals sold at the Huanan seafood market and the rapid release of four preprints describing Guangdong pangolin CoV sequences fueled support for the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 had spilled over from the wildlife trade. However, since then, international efforts have failed to identify a proximal animal source or a direct precursor of SARS-CoV-2. No SC2-like viruses have been found in the wildlife trade supply to Wuhan or in bats in Hubei province. Virus tracking experts in Wuhan have not been able to find the types of evidence for a natural origin that were so quickly obtained in the case of the 2003 SARS outbreak. Under these circumstances where definitive evidence has yet to be found and investigations have been hindered, it would be premature to declare the origin of the pandemic solved or to claim that the scientific evidence for a natural spillover origin at the Huanan seafood market is overwhelming.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 456 | |
| downloads | 236 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts