Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Electrodermal Activity artifact correction BEnchmark (EDABE)

Authors: Llanes-Jurado, Jose; Carrasco-Ribelles, Lucia; Alcañiz, Mariano; Parra, Elena; Marín-Morales, Javier;

Electrodermal Activity artifact correction BEnchmark (EDABE)

Abstract

"Electrodermal Activity artifact correction BEnchmark" (EDABE) is a dataset for training and testing artifact recognition and correction models to automatically remove major artifacts in electrodermal activity (EDA) signals. It is the first public benchmark to compare methods. EDABE contains a total of 74.46 h of EDA recording affected by hand and body motion artifacts from 43 subjects. It is divided into a training set with 33 subjects (56.27 h), and test set with 10 subjects (18.19 h). The data was collected using a Shimmer3 GSR+ Unit at 128 Hz. The dataset is used to develop a fully automatic pipeline that emulates the manual correction done by the expert, providing a final clean signal. The paper that describe the pipeline is currently in a peer-review process. Each file includes in the filename the user_id and the expert that correct the signal. In addition, the file includes the signal with the following variables: time: timestamp of the signal. rawdata: raw data obtained by Shimmer3 GSR+ Unit. cleandata: reconstructed clean signal performed by a human expert. binarytarget: label of each sample as artefact or no artifact. signal_automatic: automatic cleaning of the signal performed by the automatic pipeline. predArtifacts: label predicted by the automatic cleaning pipeline. postProcessedPredArtifacts: label predicted by the automatic cleaning pipeline after postprocessing.

The research leading to this dataset has received partial funding from the European Commission (RHUMBO H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018-813234), and from the Universitat Politècnica de València (PAID-10-20)

Keywords

galvanic skin response, artifact, artefact, electrodermal activity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 10
  • 10
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
10
Funded by