Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In 2021, on behalf of the Canadian Persistent Identifier Advisory Committee (CPIDAC), the Canadian Research Knowledge Network (CRKN) in partnership with the Digital Research Alliance of Canada consulted with MoreBrains Cooperative, international experts in PIDs and PID Strategy development, to assess the situation of PIDs in Canada and to provide a snapshot of our starting point as we embark on developing a national strategy. MoreBrains outlined a foundation-laying approach and identified information gaps to fill before a complete PID strategy could be laid out. Participants included university leadership, researchers, professional associations, federal and provincial funders, technical experts, and more. *************************** En 2021, au nom du Comité consultatif canadien sur les identifiants pérennes (CCCPID), le Réseau canadien de documentation pour la recherche (RCDR) en partenariat avec l’Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada a fait appel à MoreBrains Cooperative, des spécialistes internationaux en matière de PID et d’élaboration de stratégies sur les PID, afin d’évaluer la situation des PID au Canada et de donner un aperçu de notre point de départ, au moment d’entreprendre la création d’une stratégie nationale. MoreBrains a défini une approche visant à établir des fondations et a relevé les lacunes en matière d’information à combler avant de pouvoir élaborer une stratégie complète sur les PID. Au nombre des participants figuraient des dirigeants d’universités, des chercheurs, des associations professionnelles, des bailleurs de fonds fédéraux et provinciaux, des experts techniques, etc.
Bilingual English and French document / Document bilingue anglais-français
RCDR, Canada, Persistent Identifiers, Infrastructure de recherche, PIDs, CPIDAC, Research infrastructure, CCCPID, CRKN, Identifiants pérennes
RCDR, Canada, Persistent Identifiers, Infrastructure de recherche, PIDs, CPIDAC, Research infrastructure, CCCPID, CRKN, Identifiants pérennes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 196 | |
| downloads | 138 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts