Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Andoni, Robu, Flynn, et al., Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019; 100), 143-174", "Bednar and Spiekermann-Hoff, The power of ethics: How value-based thinking fosters creative and sustainable IT product innovation, 2021", "Bogers, Chesbrough and Moedas, Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies, California Management Review, 2018; 2(60), 5-16, 10.1177/0008125617745086", "Breuer and L\u00fcdeke-Freund, Values-Based Innovation Framework--Innovating by What We Care About, Journal Year", "Ciriello, Richter and Schwabe, Digital innovation, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2018; 6(60), 563-569", "Dziallas and Blind, Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis, Technovation, 2019; 80), 3-29", "Fagerberg, Innovation: A guide to the literature, Journal Georgia Institute of Technology, Year", "Fernandes and Martins, Model of value based innovation, Chinese Business Review, 2011; 10(10)", "CNN money (1955-2005). Fortune500.(https://money.cnn.com/magazines /fortune/fortune500_archive/full/1991/)", "Hasse, Von Perfall, Hillebrand, et al., Blockchain\u2013an opportunity for energy producers and consumers, PwC global power & utilities, 2016; 1-45", "Henderson, Innovation in the 21st century: architectural change, purpose, and the challenges of our time, Management Science, 2021; 9(67), 5479-5488", "Hinings, Gegenhuber and Greenwood, Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective, Information and Organization, 2018; 1(28), 52-61", "Kahn, Understanding innovation, Business Horizons, 2018; 3(61), 453-460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.011", "Kallinikos, Aaltonen and Marton, The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts, Mis Quarterly, 2013; 2(37), 357-370", "Kline and Rosenberg. (2009). N. Rosenberg, 173-203. USA: Stanford University", "Kohli and Melville, Digital innovation: A review and synthesis, Information Systems Journal, 2019; 1(29), 200-223", "Mendling, Pentland and Recker, Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation, European Journal of Information Systems, 2020; 3(29), 208-219, 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1755207", "Mooi, Rudd and De Jong, Process innovation and performance: the role of divergence, European Journal of Marketing, 2020", "Ni\u017eeti\u0107, \u0160oli\u0107, L\u00f3pez-De-Ipi\u00f1a Gonz\u00e1lez-De-Artaza and Patrono, Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities, issues and challenges towards a smart and sustainable future, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020; 274), 122877, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122877", "Nord, Koohang and Paliszkiewicz, The Internet of Things: Review and theoretical framework, Expert Systems with Applications, 2019; 133), 97-108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.014", "Nunes and Abreu, Managing Open Innovation Project Risks Based on a Social Network Analysis Perspective, Sustainability, 2020; 12), 3132, 10.3390/su12083132", "Oskam, De Man, Bossink, et al. Business model innovation for sustainability. thesis. 2021. Hogeschool van Amsterdam", "Popkova, Egorova, Popova and Pozdnyakova. (2019). E. G. Popkova, 1137-1144. Cham: Springer International Publishing", "Schultheiss, The Agile Innovation Framework: A Next Generation Innovation (Process) Model, 2018", "Singh, Javaid, Haleem and Suman, Internet of things (IoT) applications to fight against COVID-19 pandemic, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 2020; 4(14), 521-524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.041", "Wang, Li and Zhan, Blockchain technology in the energy sector: From basic research to real world applications, Computer Science Review, 2021; 39), 100362", "Wang, Li and Zhan, Blockchain technology in the energy sector: From basic research to real world applications, Computer Science Review, 2021; 39), 100362", "Yoo, Boland, Lyytinen and Majchrzak, Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World, Organization Science, 2012; 23), 1398-1408, 10.1287/orsc.1120.0771", "Yoo, Henfridsson and Lyytinen, Research commentary\u2014the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research, Information systems research, 2010; 4(21), 724-735", "Zhang, Sun, Liu and Chang, Consumer innovativeness, product innovation and smart toys, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2020; 41), 100974"]}
In the 21st century, digital development is a threat to the growth and business model of most service and product providers after a while. Unlimited business managers see them in danger, which is the effect of technology development. Consumer behavior changes are threatening as they want to access everything easily and have more freedom. These behavior changes were collected and measured, and companies like Amazon, Uber, Zipcar, Airbnb, AngelList, and Castlight appeared in this digital era and made life easier for the consumer. According to this digital technology development, they understand that innovation comes first in the market. If one business doesn't bring competitive and valuable advantages, consumers will remove them from the market; Nokia is a good example. In the Digital era, digital innovation is the mother of innovation in the present century, and all businesses follow the rule of digital innovation and innovation models and frameworks. Nowadays, Digital innovation changed people's lives and, on the other hand, made them lazy, while now they can control what they have in-home with one regular phone even when they are not in the home and can buy everything but lay down in bed. Digital Innovation includes computers, TV, applications, cars, etc. For success in digital innovations, most companies try to use open innovation to increase success and profit and decrease cost and risk. At the same time, some of them are scared to enter open innovation projects as they want to remove some other competitors. In open innovation, while two companies compete, they share what is achieved and let consumers choose which product fits their needs.
Digital innovation, Open innovation, Fishbone, Innovation
Digital innovation, Open innovation, Fishbone, Innovation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| downloads | 2 |

Downloads provided by UsageCounts