Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation techniques are widely used for various natural science applications. Increasingly, machine learning (ML) force field (FF) models begin to replace ab-initio simulations by predicting forces directly from atomic structures. Despite significant progress in this area, such techniques are primarily benchmarked by their force/energy prediction errors, even though the practical use case would be to produce realistic MD trajectories. We aim to fill this gap by introducing a novel benchmark suite for learned MD simulation. We curate representative MD systems, including water, organic molecules, a peptide, and materials, and design evaluation metrics corresponding to the scientific objectives of respective systems. We benchmark a collection of state-of-the-art (SOTA) ML FF models and illustrate, in particular, how the commonly benchmarked force accuracy is not well aligned with relevant simulation metrics. We demonstrate when and how selected SOTA methods fail, along with offering directions for further improvement. Specifically, we identify stability as a key metric for ML models to improve. Our benchmark suite comes with a comprehensive open-source codebase for training and simulation with ML FFs to facilitate future work.
31 pages, 18 figures
Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, FOS: Physical sciences, Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph), molecular dynamics, machine learning force fields, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Physics - Chemical Physics, machine learning potentials, Physics - Computational Physics
Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, FOS: Physical sciences, Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph), molecular dynamics, machine learning force fields, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Physics - Chemical Physics, machine learning potentials, Physics - Computational Physics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 200 | |
| downloads | 130 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts