
Fig. 5. Species tree and species delimitation in the Cryptopone gilva complex.The species tree was inferred using SNP data and the Bayesian program SNAPP, with the resulting tree set displayed using DensiTree.The SNAPP densitree shows at least four clearly differentiated species-level lineages. Species delimitation using the programs BPP, SODA, and bPTP, recovered between 4 and 17 species.The results for the UCE samples only are mapped onto the SNAPP densitree result. The connected red bars represent single species that were not monophyletic in the SNAPP phylogeny. The colored boxes and blue species names represent the final species delimitation and taxonomy.
Published as part of Branstetter, Michael G. & Longino, John T., 2022, UCE Phylogenomics of New World Cryptopone (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Elucidates Genus Boundaries, Species Boundaries, and the Vicariant History of a, pp. 1-23 in Insect Systematics and Diversity (AIFB) 6 (1) on page 11, DOI: 10.1093/isd/ixab031, http://zenodo.org/record/7182481
Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Cryptopone, Biodiversity, Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Taxonomy
Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Cryptopone, Biodiversity, Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
