Downloads provided by UsageCounts
There has been much recent interest in building continuous speech recognition systems for people with severe speech impairments, e.g., dysarthria. However, the datasets that are commonly used are typically designed for tasks other than ASR development, or they contain only isolated words. As such, they contain much overlap in the prompts read by the speakers. Previous ASR evaluations have often neglected this, using language models (LMs) trained on nondisjoint training and test data, potentially producing unrealistically optimistic results. In this paper, we investigate the impact of LM design using the widely used TORGO database. We combine stateof-the-art acoustic models with LMs trained with data originating from LibriSpeech. Using LMs with varying vocabulary size, we examine the trade-off between the out-of-vocabulary rate and recognition confusions for speakers with varying degrees of dysarthria. It is found that the optimal LM complexity is highly speaker dependent, highlighting the need to design speaker-dependent LMs alongside speaker-dependent acoustic models when considering atypical speech.
language modelling, out-of-domain data, Continuous dysarthric speech recognition
language modelling, out-of-domain data, Continuous dysarthric speech recognition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts