Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DRAFT D2.9 Code of Best Practices and Policy Recommendations

Authors: Sganga, Caterina; Signoretta, Camilla; Mezei, Peter; Ferri, Delia; Higgins, Noelle;

DRAFT D2.9 Code of Best Practices and Policy Recommendations

Abstract

This deliverable contains the Best Practices and Policy Recommendations developed by WP2 on copyright flexibilities and access to culture. Best practices are directed to stakeholders and aim at facilitating the understanding and use of the most important copyright flexibilities offered by the EU and national legal systems. Policy Recommendations build on the data and other findings produced by WP2 research to propose reforms directed to national and EU policymakers, with the aim of achieving a fairer copyright balance, which incentivises a diversified and competitive cultural and creative production while ensuring access to culture and the enjoyment of basic fundamental rights to all. Best practises were compiled on the basis of the mapping of statutory and case law sources in all Member States. They were tested at an expert and stakeholders workshop that took place in Amsterdam (Institute of Information Law – University of Amsterdam) on 21 September 2022, and was jointly organized with Communia. On the basis of the feedback received, the best practices will be transformed into guidance, rendered more user-friendly and disseminated online via social media, stakeholders’ organizations, and the website www.copyrightuser.eu and www.copyrightflexibilities.eu. Draft policy recommendations were compiled in coordination with other WPs and tested in an informal workshop held in Brussels on 20 September 2022 with interested EC policymakers. On the basis of the feedback received, and of other informal exchanges which are planned in the following months, they will be revised in structure and approach in order to be ultimately presented at the project’s final conference at the end of January 2023. Guidance and best practices were prepared on the basis of the findings of the EU and comparative mapping of copyright flexibilities, and on the outcome of the surveys and interviews conducted under WP2. They were tested at a workshop with experts and stakeholders held at the Institute of Information Law of the University of Amsterdam on 21 September 2022. Please note: a screen-reader accessible version of this report can be downloaded via this link https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1L21grMz-WfOLEp5W6jo7bP-tx5Azai1Q On the basis of the feedback received, they will be revised and embedded in a stakeholder-friendly format on the website www.copyrightuser.eu, and presented at the project’s final conference at the end of March 2023

Related Organizations
Keywords

copyright, best practices, copyright flexibilities, digital culture, policy recommendations

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 82
    download downloads 39
  • 82
    views
    39
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
82
39
Green
Related to Research communities