Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Review . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Review . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Review . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

PREreview of "Cancer risk among adolescents and young adults living with HIV in South Africa: a national cohort study"

Authors: Adeleye A. Edema; Moboluwaduro Ogunmolu; Motunrayo Aiyegbusi; Opeyemi Aweda; Olaide Damilola Olagoke; Emmanuel Amadi; Samson Kosemani; +4 Authors

PREreview of "Cancer risk among adolescents and young adults living with HIV in South Africa: a national cohort study"

Abstract

This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/7145372. This full PREreview is the result of a live-streamed preprint journal club organized and hosted by AfricArXiv, Eider Africa, eLife, PREreview, and Training Center in Communication Africa as part of the Open Peer Reviewers in Africa workshop training. An important study has been conducted by the authors at a time when many developing countries face challenges in the medical field due to limited access to technologies. This was a study from the National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) and the pathology-based national Cancer Registry (NCR) records for 2004-2014 carried out to investigate the incidence and risk factor of various types of cancer in adolescence and young adults living with HIV in South Africa (correlation between cancer and HIV). This study adopted the privacy-preserving probabilistic record linkage methods to first identify HIV-related laboratory records most likely belonged to the same individual. The researchers further linked these individuals to cancer diagnoses from the NCR. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the risk factor of cancer in HIV infected individuals within the ages of 15-24 years in South Africa. The study finds that Kaposi sarcoma was more prevalent in the age group 20-24 years than the 15- 19 years and the higher age groups have a higher prevalence of cervical cancer. The authors therefore concluded that infection - related cancers were the most common type of cancer occurring in adolescents. They recommend that innovative strategies are needed to encourage early ART initiation and enhance treatment adherence in adolescents and young adults living with HIV. Lists of major issues and feedback The reviewers believe that addressing the following major issues would significantly strengthen the conclusion of the study: The data presented by this study might not reflect the actual situation. The reviewers are suggesting the possibility of the number of young people living with HIV might actually be much higher than reported due to the exclusion of individuals without information on sex and age from the study. We encourage authors to consider and possibly include the number of individuals without information on sex and age inorder to ascertain if it does not in any way skew the analysis of data reported. The data used for this study are not recent and might not be appropriate to justify results in recent time. We recommend the authors to consider the data within the last 8 years. We understand by the authors that age is the only predisposing factor to cancer in adolescents and young adults in South Africa between 2004-2014 from their study. We proposed that other factors should be mentioned such as the patient's lifestyle etc. To further improve the manuscript, the authors could organize the writeup using the format that clearly outlines different sections accordingly; 'Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion and Acknowledgement' to make their write up readable and enjoyable. Lists of minor issues and feedback Abbreviations of words were not consistent, for example ALYALWH instead of AYALWH. We recommend authors to proofread their write up and maintain abbreviations for easy understanding. The introduction needs more background information.The introduction of this report will be more enlightening if more literature review is added. The format for the presentation of figures was not followed. The title for figures should be below the figures not above. Typographical errors such as the format of dating should be looked into. For example, 25th not 25th as the latter is used in positions but not dates. The text in the figure wasn't clear enough. The figure should be made clear to understand the information in it. We thank the authors for sharing their work as a preprint. We hope our feedback above will be helpful as they consider any revisions to the manuscript or future lines of work. Competing interests The author declares that they have no competing interests.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 17
    download downloads 9
  • 17
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
17
9
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research