{"references": ["Black, E. (1980). A note on theory and practice in rhetorical criticism. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44, 331-336.", "Brockriede, W. (1974). Rhetorical criticism as argument. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 165-174.", "Campbell, J. A. (1990). Special issue on rhetorical criticism. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 249-251.", "Gaonkar, D. P. (1990). Object and method in rhetorical criticism: From Wicheins to Leff and McGee. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 290-316.", "Leff, M. (1980). Interpretation and the art of the rhetorical critic. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44, 337-349.", "Leff, M. (1986). Textual criticism: The legacy of G.P. Mohrmann. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 72, 377-3 89.", "Leff, M. (1988). Dimensions of temporality in Lincoln's second inaugural. Communication Reports, 1, 26-31.", "Leff, M. & Sachs, A. (1990). Words the most like things: Iconicity and the rhetorical text. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 252-273.", "Leff, M. (1992). Things made by words: Reflections on textual criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78, 223-231.", "Redding, W. C. (1957). Extrinsic and intrinsic criticism. Western Speech, 96-103."]}

The essay explores a new method of close textual analysis—one that neither applies common theoretical frameworks to a rhetorical artifact nor abandons theory entirely. It compares and contrasts the ideas of Michael Leff and Michael McGee and supports a method that merges the two camps. The essay argues that a solely deductive approach to rhetorical criticism, which merely imposes theory on a textual object, is not a practical approach for extracting valuable insights from a text. Conversely, Leff’s essentially atheoretical approach to the close reading of texts is overly systematic and somewhat monotonous. The essay supports the idea that textual analysis should examine the implicit microfeatures of discourse and therefore uses the Unabomber Manifesto as an abbreviated case study for illustrating a process of close reading that utilizes theory in a more inductive manner.