Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Malaria Parasitaemia and Uptake of Intermittent Preventive Treatment among Pregnant Nigerian Igbo Women

Authors: Joseph Ifeanyi Brian-D Adinma; Stella Ekene Ogamba; Mark Mathew Edet; Dennis N. Aribodor;

Malaria Parasitaemia and Uptake of Intermittent Preventive Treatment among Pregnant Nigerian Igbo Women

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa are highly vulnerable to malaria during pregnancy and are usually targeted to receive special preventive care for malaria using intermittent preventive treatment (IPT). Objectives: To determine the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia and uptake of IPT among pregnant Nigerian Igbo women. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 330 pregnant women from two public and private health facilities. Microscopy was used to determine prevalence of malaria in pregnancy while structured pretested questionnaire was used to determine the level of knowledge, and use of IPT among them. Data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 25 software. Chi-square test was used for comparison of variables at p <0.05% level of significance. Results: Malaria prevalence was 18.5% and was highest for women of 20-24 years age range (24.3%). Knowledge of IPT was 76.7% while uptake was 58.8%. IPT uptake was highest amongst pregnant women aged 20-24 years (70.3%) and lowest amongst those aged 35-39years (50.0%). Compliance-knowledge index to IPT was significantly higher among the pregnant women with complete data (0.77) compared to the no response group (0.57), p=0.012. Pregnant women with tertiary educational qualifications had the highest level of compliance 60(61.2%) compared to secondary 120(58.5%) and primary 14(51.9%). Conclusion: Malaria parasitaemia occurred in 18.5% of the women. IPT knowledge and compliance were 76.7% and 57.7% respectively. Low Compliance-knowledge index amongst non-responders to question IPT compliance suggests ineffective malaria prevention awareness creation. The need to review malaria prevention awareness-creation strategies and encourage early ANC booking is recommended to improve IPT uptake.

Keywords

Malaria parasitaemia, Pregnant Nigeria Igbo women., Uptake of intermittent preventive treatments (IPT)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 9
  • 4
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
9
Green