The way we cite: common metadata used across disciplines for defining bibliographic references

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Presentation , Other literature type 22 Sep 2022 English Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:EC | OpenAIRE Nexus

Authors: Peroni, Silvio;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7105255 , 10.5281/zenodo.7105254

The way we cite: common metadata used across disciplines for defining bibliographic references

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Slides of the presentation of the paper dos Santos, E. A., Peroni, S., & Mucheroni, M. L. (2022). The Way We Cite: Common Metadata Used Across Disciplines for Defining Bibliographic References. In G. Silvello, O. Corcho, P. Manghi, G. M. Di Nunzio, K. Golub, N. Ferro, & A. Poggi (Eds.), Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries - 26th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2022, Padua, Italy, September 20–23, 2022, Proceedings (pp. 120–132). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_10, freely available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.13419 at TPDL 2022.

Related Organizations

Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna
Italy

Keywords

referencing habits, bibliographic references, types of cited entities

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average