Views provided by UsageCounts
We used the annual (2002-2017) forest probability maps from Tong et al (2020) which were also derived from MODIS data. A probability threshold of 0.5 was used to define if an area is a forest or not (Tong et al., 2020). We identified three types of forests (Fig.1): (1) old forests (always forest during 2002-2017), (2) new forests (no forest in 2002 but in 2017), and potential forests (never forested during 2002-2017).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts