Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Researchers and educators in humanities such as computational linguists, digital humanists, and those doing historical reconstructions are increasingly heavy users of computational and/or data resources. Many know about activities, working groups, and initiatives around the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles and are a driving force for improving the situation for sharing data and software. However, it seems humanities researchers are less aware of the science gateways community and the end-to-end solutions that science gateways could provide, therefore lacking a driving force for adoption of this technology. Some may be creating their own gateways outside the community; others may wish to use computational and data infrastructures, but may perceive a lack of support or opportunities. Hypotheses about the reasons that humanities are not well represented as gateways builders and users include lack of funding and support by computer centers. This study will clarify some of the challenges and needs faced by computational researchers in the humanities that may explain their relatively low participation in the science gateways community. For this paper, we present the results of two interviews as proof of concept for the study. We plan to follow with 12-15 additional interviews for the larger study.
community study, science gateways, Gateways 2022, humanities
community study, science gateways, Gateways 2022, humanities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 43 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts