Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Dataset of annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) for 6,252 journals from 2015 to 2018. The dataset contains annual APCs for journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and published by the oligopoly of academic publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, Wiley). It also includes an estimate of the total APCs paid by the academic community based on the number of gold and hybrid articles published between 2015 and 2018. The dataset was created using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall and annual APC prices from open datasets (Matthias, 2020; Morrison, 2021) and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Detailed methods and findings are reported in the following journal article Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The Oligopoly's Shift to Open Access. How the Big Five Academic Publishers Profit from Article Processing Charges. Quantitative Science Studies. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8322555 Description of included files (v1): APCs.csv: contains the annual APCs for gold and hybrid OA journals indexed in Web of Science published by the oligopoly of academic publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, Wiley) between 2015 and 2018 including the total estimate of APCs paid per journal per year. It contains APC data for 18,846 journal-year-OA status combinations. countries.csv: contains the fractionalized number of annual gold and hybrid OA articles by oligopoly publishers between 2015 and 2018 and the total estimate of fractionalized APCs paid per country per journal per year. oecd.csv: contains the fractionalized number of annual gold and hybrid OA articles by oligopoly publishers between 2015 and 2018 and the total estimate of fractionalized APCs per discipline per journal per year. ReadMe.csv: contains a description of the variables used in APCs.csv, countries.csv and oecd.csv.
open access, author fees, article processing charges, Elsevier, Sage, Wiley, academic publishing market, cost of open access, Taylor & Francis, hybrid open access, oligopoly of academic publishers, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, gold open access, Unpaywall
open access, author fees, article processing charges, Elsevier, Sage, Wiley, academic publishing market, cost of open access, Taylor & Francis, hybrid open access, oligopoly of academic publishers, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, gold open access, Unpaywall
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 54 | |
| downloads | 50 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts