Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Normalized CT images and reference segmentations of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae from the CSI 2014 workshop

Authors: Lessmann, Nikolas;

Normalized CT images and reference segmentations of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae from the CSI 2014 workshop

Abstract

This is the dataset of the vertebra segmentation challenge of the CSI 2014 workshop that was held in conjunction with MICCAI 2014. 1-10: Training set, scans of 10 young adult (16-35 years old) 11-15: Test set, scans of 5 young adult (20-35 years old) 16-20: Test set, scans of 5 patients with vertebral compression fractures Scans were acquired at the Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine and were published under the ODC Public Domain Dedication and License on SpineWeb (datasets 2 and 15). The dataset and challenge is further described in this publication: A multi-center milestone study of clinical vertebral CT segmentation The data that is published here has been normalized: Voxel values are Hounsfield values and have been clipped to [-1000, 3095] Image origin has been set to 0,0,0 Image orientation has been standardized to RAI orientation Small islands and other obvious mistakes have been removed Segmentation masks have been smoothed with a 2x2x2 median filter Vertebrae have been anatomically labeled (8 = T1, 9 = T2, ..., 24 = L5) Because not always all visible vertebrae were segmented in the original data, only segmentations of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae have been retained License This dataset is released under the Open Data Commons Attribution License (which the original license allows me to do). When using this dataset for publication of any kind, please reference the following paper to meet the attribution requirement: Yao J, Burns JE, Forsberg D, Seitel A, Rasoulian A, Abolmaesumi P, Hammernik K, Urschler M, Ibragimov B, Korez R, Vrtovec T, Castro-Mateos I, Pozo JM, Frangi AF, Summers RM, Li S. A multi-center milestone study of clinical vertebral CT segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2016; 49:16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.12.006. There is no need to reference this upload, referencing the original authors is sufficient. Notes The dataset contains 2 cases with only 4 lumbar vertebrae in which L5/S1 has not been segmented (i.e., label 25 is missing). The resolution and segmentation quality of the diseased cases (16-20) is quite low.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 90
    download downloads 846
  • 90
    views
    846
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
90
846