Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Ultra-precise observations from space missions such as CoRoT, Kepler/K2 or TESS can be contrasted with data from ground-based surveys such as CARMENES or HARPS to validate extra-solar planets detection through spectroscopy or using different photometric bands to discard false positives. Though several thousands of exoplanets have already been confirmed the number of candidates is orders of magnitude higher. Since it is not possible to allocate time from ground-based surveys to perform the follow-up of all the candidates, an automatic validation procedure is required which is robust enough to confirm the detections. I introduce here a new validation method for exoplanet transit candidates based on modeling the data as auto-regressive processes. These can fit either stellar pulsations, stellar activity or any intrinsic variability so they are very suitable to model out of transit light variations. This procedure does not require any a priori from the star or planet such as period, depth, duration or shape of the signal. It neither does require any colors, spectroscopic observations or any informed assumptions, only one light curve with several transits is required. Here I show that transits can be validated with no necessity of follow-up observations in many cases and false positives can be reliably identified with auto-regressive models.
{"references": ["Pascual-Granado, J., Garrido R., and Su\u00e1rez, J.C. 2015, A&A, 575, A78", "Pascual-Granado, J., Su\u00e1rez, J.C., Garrido, R., et al. 2018, A&A, 614, A40", "Holdsworth et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1073", "Tarnopolski, M. et al. 2020, ApJS, 250, 1"]}
https://github.com/javier-iaa/MIARMA
transits, machine learning, data analysis, exoplanet, lightcurves
transits, machine learning, data analysis, exoplanet, lightcurves
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts