Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Thesis . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Thesis . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

COVID-19 INFODEMIC IN THE TWITTERVERSE: CHARACTERIZATION OF MISINFORMATION SPREAD AND TWITTER BOT ACTIVITY BY CRITICAL MASS, ENERGY DECAY, ENTANGLEMENTS, AND NODE SYNCHRONIZATION USING MULTILAYER AND SPECTRAL GRAPH VISUALIZATIONS, KURAMOTO MODELING, SONIFICATION, AND WAVEFUNCTION SIMULATION

Authors: HERNANDEZ, JOANNES PAULUS TOLENTINO;

COVID-19 INFODEMIC IN THE TWITTERVERSE: CHARACTERIZATION OF MISINFORMATION SPREAD AND TWITTER BOT ACTIVITY BY CRITICAL MASS, ENERGY DECAY, ENTANGLEMENTS, AND NODE SYNCHRONIZATION USING MULTILAYER AND SPECTRAL GRAPH VISUALIZATIONS, KURAMOTO MODELING, SONIFICATION, AND WAVEFUNCTION SIMULATION

Abstract

No communication framework for “infodemiology” or investigative techniques within the discipline of communication have covered measurement of Twitter bots’ “virality” and (massive) “misinformation spread” by energy with mass and energy equivalence because these are relegated to quantum mechanics. To posit infodemical measurements, this study of “COVID-19 infodemic” on Twitter characterizes misinformation spread and Twitter bot activity by critical mass, energy decay, entanglements, and node synchronization using multilayer and spectral graph visualizations, Kuramoto modeling, sonification, and wavefunction simulation. The Python-based analytics pipeline was developed based on fundamental conceptualizations of 7 communication theories and quantum mechanics. Simulation and (stochastic) modeling were implemented to investigate the intra- and interlayer relationships between bots, humans, and tweets. This study endeavored on: (1) theorizing “virality” and bot activity, (2) data mining using Hoaxy® and bot detection set at ≥.43 using Botometer®, and (3) comprehensive analysis using state-of-the-art techniques and statistics. Misinformation spreads more frequently with user replies than with retweets and faster through interlayer edges. Super spreaders were detected using centrality-based metrics. Bots that had high betweenness and eigenvector centralities, random walk score, and PageRank score were false human accounts. Bot cliques emerged inconsistently by edge entanglement with humans. False human accounts were central spreaders and were detectable by an increase in percolation centrality, random walk and PageRank scores. Spammers were peripheral spreaders with scores decreased or unchanged whenever indirectly connected to human hubs. False human accounts connect by power-law distribution. Many cross-links were shown between bots and humans. Overall, bots (re)produce the intrinsic “virality” of tweets with human users. Bots synchronized (partially) around 400 seconds (6.67 minutes) at peak before reaching 200 seconds (3.33 minutes). Time to critical mass can be anticipated at .00025 seconds when bots have synchronized. Based on wavefunction simulation, a 13.55% tweet increase can generate a 29.45% network energy inflation at .70 (70%) bot “virality” within 9 months (peaked at 7th month). Energy from critical mass due to bots can equal to 9.61 x 106 J, which can start to decay at .0015 seconds. Bots oscillated from <25 dB to 94.12 dB at 2090.91 Hz with 2 plateaus throughout the cycle. Bots maybe disbanded within .26 seconds at 50 J counter energy. On the other hand, a bot mass of 9.51 x 10-30 can equal to 1.58 x 10-13 J of kinetic energy per 2.14 x 10-18 J energy increment in the network or as much as .02 micro-Sievert/hour of ionizing radiation produced by a plain chest-x-ray. A full-length Twitter data sonification is required to validate these findings while all logical and seed values have to be standardized. Model validation must be conducted in the future.

PhD Dissertation

Related Organizations
Keywords

entanglements, virality, critical mass, wavefunction simulation, Twitter bots, complex graph visualizations, node synchronization, sonification, COVID-19 infodemic, misinformation, energy decay, spectral graph visualizations

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 33
    download downloads 32
  • 33
    views
    32
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
33
32
Green
Related to Research communities