Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Brachypnoea Gistel 1848

Authors: Bezděk, Jan;

Brachypnoea Gistel 1848

Abstract

Brachypnoea Gistel, 1848 Brachypnoea Gistel, 1848a: 404; GISTEL (1848b):123; GISTEL (1851): 123. Current status. Valid genus name in Eumolpinae (MONRÓS & BECHYNÉ 1956, RILEY et al. 2003). Comments. Brachypnoea Gistel, 1848 was proposed as a new replacement name for Noda Chevrolat, 1836 (a junior homonym of Noda Schellenberg, 1803 in Diptera, see BOUCHARD & BOUSQUET 2013). SEENO & WILCOX (1982) mistakenly gave priority to Nodonota Lefèvre, 1885 over the older Brachypnoea Gistel, 1848.

Published as part of Bezděk, Jan, 2020, Review of the genus-level names proposed by Johannes Gistel in Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera), pp. 173-188 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 60 (1) on page 178, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2020.011, http://zenodo.org/record/3879369

Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Brachypnoea, Arthropoda, Chrysomelidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average