Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The RIA tool, consisting of six domains to assess the research integrity of RCTs included in systematic reviews, is a new transparent option to include the concept of research integrity in evidence synthesis as part of the eligibility screening. Brief summary: Potentially eligible RCTs identified during screening should be assessed for research integrity hierarchically considering domain 1 to 6. Retraction, lack of prospective registration, lack of adequate ethical approval with informed written consent, inconsistencies in the author group and the location of the study, lack of proper randomization, implausible study results should lead to exclusion of a RCT. Concerns with the RCT in any domain put the study in ‘awaiting classification’ and should lead to further investigations. If no concerns appear through all domains or could be clarified, e.g. in correspondence with study authors, the RCT meets criteria for inclusion in the review and can be processed further. In living systematic reviews, included RCTs and RCTs ‘awaiting classification’ must be reassessed for retraction notices.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 23 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts