Downloads provided by UsageCounts
As a result of the analysis of the practice of drinking water integral assessment in terms of chemical safety indicators, problems were identified regarding the minimum required number of samples, the minimum mandatory list of indicators. Based on the results of laboratory analysis of drinking water quality in some towns in the Leningrad Region, risk values and integral indicators were calculated using 3 methods. According to the authors, the most realistic is the calculation of indicators based on the average values of controlled indicators for the year preceding the calculations and only at the point before being fed into the distribution network (method #3).
integral assessment of drinking water, unfavorable organoleptic effects, non-carcinogenic risk, carcinogenic risk, Leningrad region.
integral assessment of drinking water, unfavorable organoleptic effects, non-carcinogenic risk, carcinogenic risk, Leningrad region.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts