Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this deliverable we report on efforts of EATRIS-Plus sites in the certification of pre-analytical sample processing and in the development of reference values and material for omics technologies used to generate the multiomics data in WP1. The technical validity of an experimental process, the quality of the resulting data and reproducibility of the results can be assessed by comparing the data to a known range of values that were developed from well-characterized samples and controlled experimental conditions. Since the experimental processes can differ widely, it is useful to develop target ranges of detection, that are applicable to most commonly used technologies. The development of reference material and the use of target value ranges is discussed in principle and in examples.
Performance Evaluation, omics technologies, SEQC2, personalised medicine, personalized medicine, DNA, reference values, RNAseq, omics, Standard Operating Procedure, mass spectrometric analysis, Reference data, NGS, Proficiency Testing, comparability, MAQC, microRNA q-RTPCR, reproducibility, multiomics, Conformity assessment, WGS, reference samples, MicroArray and Sequencing Quality Control (MAQC), miRNA
Performance Evaluation, omics technologies, SEQC2, personalised medicine, personalized medicine, DNA, reference values, RNAseq, omics, Standard Operating Procedure, mass spectrometric analysis, Reference data, NGS, Proficiency Testing, comparability, MAQC, microRNA q-RTPCR, reproducibility, multiomics, Conformity assessment, WGS, reference samples, MicroArray and Sequencing Quality Control (MAQC), miRNA
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 20 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts