Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Although the number of collaborative patents is small and the rate of patent collaboration is low, the average citation rate of collaborative patents is substantially high. Among the collaborative patents with various validity terms, the collaborative patents with 12-year validity terms have the highest average number of citations. The explanation for this has yet to be determined. The average number of citations of collaborative patents with 4- and 8-year validity terms was similar; however, their collaboration rates differed significantly. A comparison of the two technological fields revealed fewer collaborative patents and a lower collaboration rate across the four validity terms in the ME technological field than in the EE technological field; the average number of citations across the four validity terms was higher in the ME technological field than in the EE technological field. The results indicate that collaborative patents have a significant effect across the four validity terms.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 30 | |
| downloads | 59 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts