Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The popularization of scientific papers is conducive to deepening the public's scientific understanding of epidemic-related knowledge and reducing public psychological panic. The above analysis shows that there are still problems in the promotion and reporting of scientific papers in China, and there are phenomena such as generalization, holding a hundred by one, excessive use of words, speculation and improper citation in the process of popularization of scientific papers, which make the dissemination of scientific achievements lose Truthfulness, objectivity, and scientificity. The news media, with its unique advantages, plays an obvious role in the writing and dissemination of scientific articles, while scientists, as owners of the papers, lose their "voice" in the process. These findings may help scientific paper writers gain a clearer understanding of the current challenges, and to adjust themselves to the problems that arise in scientific papers.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts