Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pichipilus undetermined

Authors: Beck, Robin M. D.; Voss, Robert S.; Jansa, Sharon A.;

Pichipilus undetermined

Abstract

† Pichipilus SPECIES SCORED: † Pichipilus osborni (type species), † P. centinelus, † P. riggsi. GEOLOGICAL PROVENANCE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Santa Cruz Formation, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina († Pichipilus osborni and † P. centinelus); Sarmiento Formation, Colué-Huapí Member, Gran Barranca, Chubut Province, Argentina († P. riggsi). AGE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Examined specimens of † Pichipilus osborni and † P. centinelus are from “Notohippidian” (“Notohippidense”) sites in the Santa Cruz Formation, which appear to represent the early part of the Santacrucian SALMA (about14–19 Mya; see † Stilotherium, above). By contrast, the Colué-Huapí fauna of the Sarmiento Formation, the type fauna of the Colhuehuapian SALMA and source of our material of † P. riggsi, is estimated to span the interval from 20.0 to 20.4 Mya (i.e., early Miocene) based on radiometric and magnetostratigraphic evidence (Ré et al., 2010). ASSIGNED AGE RANGE: 20.400 –14.000 Mya. REMARKS: The holotype and only known specimen of † Pichipilus centinelus, a partial cranium and associated partial left mandible (MLP- 68-I-17-204) described by Marshall and Pascual (1977; see also Goin et al., 2003, 2007b), is one of only a handful of fossil paucituberculatan skulls currently known. Conflicting opinions have been expressed as to whether this specimen preserves evidence of an anteorbital vacuity between the nasal, frontal, and maxillary bones, a distinctive cranial feature that is unique to caenolestids among extant marsupials (Thomas, 1895; Osgood, 1921, 1924; Bublitz, 1987; Patterson and Gallardo, 1987; Goin et al., 2003, 2007; Abello, 2007). Most of our character data for † Pichipilus is based on MLP-68-I-17-204. However, we also used specimens of † P. osborni (known only from the holotype, a partial mandible) and † P. riggsi for scoring dental characters (see Abello, 2007). † Pichipilus was referred by Goin et al. (2009a) to the family † Pichipilidae, which falls within the larger clade Palaeothentoidea in recent large-scale phylogenetic analyses of Paucituberculata (Abello, 2013; Rincón et al., 2015; Engelman et al., 2016; Abello et al., 2020).

Published as part of Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457) on page 320, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/6971356

Related Organizations
Keywords

Mammalia, Animalia, Paucituberculata, Biodiversity, Pichipilus, Caenolestidae, Chordata, Pichipilus undetermined, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2