Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The three-tiered framework can be seen as a comprehensive approach. It includes Brazilian particularities but is comprehensive and feasible enough to be implemented in other contexts. Thus, we can rely on this framework as a useful policy tool to evaluate DGS outputs, outcomes and impacts to reach more efficient administration, improved services and equal participation for citizens. Despite a complete framework of DGS intended for outputs, outcomes and impacts, the causality attribution is not direct, especially for long-term impacts. Furthermore, the success of an outcome and impact indicator framework depends on its operationalization. Indicators should be monitored at least annually, and the information produced must be used in the policy cycle. Thus, it will be necessary to make an impact evaluation from time to time, preferably using an external team. Hence, the evaluation indicator framework for the monitoring process does not substitute an impact evaluation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts