Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["[1]\tGuzel O, Guner EI. ISO 15189 accreditation: Requirements for quality and competence of medical laboratories, experience of a laboratory I. Clin Biochem 2009;42:274-8. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.09.011.", "[2]\tShahangian S, Snyder SR. Laboratory medicine quality indicators: a review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:418- 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/AJCPJF8JI4ZLDQUE", "[3]\tKoseoglu M, Hur A, Atay A, Cuhadar S. Effects of hemolysis interference on routine biochemistry parameters. Biochem Med 2011;21:79-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/ BM.2011.015.", "[4]\tBowen RAR, Remaley AT. Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays. Biochem Med 2014;24:31-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/ BM.2014.006.", "[5]\tCarraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a Stat Laboratory: Types and Frequencies 10 Years Later. Clin Chem 2007;53:1338-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344.", "[6]\t Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001.", "[7]\t]O'Kane M. The reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the medical laboratory. Clin Chim Acta June 2009;404(1):28\u201331 [Epub 2009 M", "[8]\tPlebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44(6):750\u20139.", "[9]\tGoswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Mallika V. Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48(1):63\u20136.", "[10]\tDale Jane C, Novis David A. Outpatient Phlebotomy Success and Reasons for Specimen Rejection A Q-Probes Study. Arch Pathol Lab Med April", "[11]\tGungor M, Kural A, Seval H, BercikInal B, Coskun C, Ozturk H, et al. Measurement uncertainty in clinical biochemistry, ABSTRACTS. Clin Biochem 2009;42:324\u201337.", "[12]\tomero A, Cobos A, G\u00f3mez J, Mu\u00f1oz M. Role of training activities for the reduction of preanalytical errors in laboratory samples from primary care. Clin Chim Acta January 18 2012;413(1- 2):166\u20139 [Epub 2011 Sep 22].", "[13]\tSciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:79\u201385.", "[14]\tHill PM, Mareiniss D, Murphy P, Gardner H, Hsieh YH, Levy F, et al. Significant reduction of laboratory specimen labeling errors by implementation of an electronic ordering system paired with a bar-code specimen labeling process. Ann Emerg Med December 2010;56(6):630\u20136 [Epub 2010 Sep 6]."]}
Abstract: Background: Clinical chemistry specimen rejections cause a delay in the availability of findings, which might affect patient care. The study's objective is to assess sample rejection. Methods: The study measured specimen rejection rates and the contributions of different rejection reasons. The study undertook an intervention to reduce specimen rejection during 2019 intervention period. It compared rejections rates, number of months with rejection rates 1.2%, and distribution of rejection reasons between the two year-long intervals. The study also determined the origin for specimens rejected for the most common rejection reason during one month in the second period. Results: The most common reasons for rejection in hematology and biochemistry areas were clotted blood specimen, improperly labeled specimen containers and hemolyzed blood samples. Conclusions: Using Qualitative Methodology helped to formulate efficient plans to target this issue. reduce the rate of rejected samples. Moreover, the model shed the light on how crucial the pre-analytical phase for laboratory quality improvement process, its effect on cost reduction, and the importance of staff competency and utilization. Keywords: Rejection, Blood samples, pre-analytic error; quality indicators; specimen insufficient; specimen rejections. Title: Reduce Rejected Laboratory Samples and Enhance Specimen Acceptability Author: Yasir A. Ahmed, Areej Khaled Al-Zahrani, Reem Abdallah Al-Qhamdi, Ziyad Fahad Al-Otaibi, Monerah Mater Wallbi, Ahlam Abdulrahman Al-Harbi, Eman Ahmed Sunyur, Areej Nasser AlRami, Ahmed Hattan Hattan, Abdulrhman Mohammed Twhari, Alanood Khalid Alsaffi, Buthaynah Abdalrahman Alodhayb, Dalal Abdullah Alshaikhi, Abdeah Ebrahim Beshi International Journal of Life Sciences Research ISSN 2348-313X (Print), ISSN 2348-3148 (online) Vol. 10, Issue 3, July 2022 - September 2022 Page No: 14-18 Research Publish Journals Website: www.researchpublish.com Published Date: 03-August-2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6948538 Paper Download Link (Source) https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/reduce-rejected-laboratory-samples-and-enhance-specimen-acceptability
International Journal of Life Sciences Research, ISSN 2348-313X (Print), ISSN 2348-3148 (online), Research Publish Journals, Website: www.researchpublish.com
pre-analytic error, specimen rejections, https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/reduce-rejected-laboratory-samples-and-enhance-specimen-acceptability, quality indicators, Blood samples, Rejection, specimen insufficient
pre-analytic error, specimen rejections, https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/reduce-rejected-laboratory-samples-and-enhance-specimen-acceptability, quality indicators, Blood samples, Rejection, specimen insufficient
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 39 | |
| downloads | 22 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts