Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

FIES and the Gaia Benchmark stars

Authors: Vitali, Sara;

FIES and the Gaia Benchmark stars

Abstract

In the panorama of Galactic astronomy, the characterization of Milky Way stellar populations and chemical abundances is of crucial importance for revealing the structure and evolution of the Galaxy. For this reason, hundreds of thousands of spectra have already been obtained by high resolution spectroscopic surveys, and the main challenge for building an accurate picture is the homogenization of these samples from different surveys (Gaia-ESO, RAVE, LAMOST, GALAH and APOGEE) and instruments ( MIKE, FEROS, ESPADONS, HARPS, UVES, NARVAL, ELODIE and CAFE). Especially important is to understand the systematic uncertainties from the different surveys and to have comprehensive and consistent validation samples. In 2014 and 2015 the first attempt at a set of reference FGK-type stars called the Gaia FGK benchmark stars (GBS) was pub- lished (Heiter+2015, Jofre+2014). In the past 7 years much progress has been made regarding the performance of parallaxes and angular diameter measurements of stars in general and the sample has been noticeably enlarged. Currently, it comprises around 200 stars observed in both hemispheres with a magnitude range of 0 < V < 10 covering most of the parameter spaces. Among these stars 48 were observed with FIES. I conducted the observations for 15 of these stars during the NOT intership period. Their spectra have been recently analyzed using a pipeline developed in Casamiquela+2020 together with other observations of the same stars with different instruments. I will present the preliminary results of the analysis of the FIES observations, and the comparison between different instruments. The full sample of the GBS will be used as a future reference sample for stellar galactic surveys, in par- ticular the ASTRA pipeline of SDSS-V, the upcoming ESA PLATO mission, WEAVE and 4MOST.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 8
    download downloads 6
  • 8
    views
    6
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
8
6
Green