Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In the panorama of Galactic astronomy, the characterization of Milky Way stellar populations and chemical abundances is of crucial importance for revealing the structure and evolution of the Galaxy. For this reason, hundreds of thousands of spectra have already been obtained by high resolution spectroscopic surveys, and the main challenge for building an accurate picture is the homogenization of these samples from different surveys (Gaia-ESO, RAVE, LAMOST, GALAH and APOGEE) and instruments ( MIKE, FEROS, ESPADONS, HARPS, UVES, NARVAL, ELODIE and CAFE). Especially important is to understand the systematic uncertainties from the different surveys and to have comprehensive and consistent validation samples. In 2014 and 2015 the first attempt at a set of reference FGK-type stars called the Gaia FGK benchmark stars (GBS) was pub- lished (Heiter+2015, Jofre+2014). In the past 7 years much progress has been made regarding the performance of parallaxes and angular diameter measurements of stars in general and the sample has been noticeably enlarged. Currently, it comprises around 200 stars observed in both hemispheres with a magnitude range of 0 < V < 10 covering most of the parameter spaces. Among these stars 48 were observed with FIES. I conducted the observations for 15 of these stars during the NOT intership period. Their spectra have been recently analyzed using a pipeline developed in Casamiquela+2020 together with other observations of the same stars with different instruments. I will present the preliminary results of the analysis of the FIES observations, and the comparison between different instruments. The full sample of the GBS will be used as a future reference sample for stellar galactic surveys, in par- ticular the ASTRA pipeline of SDSS-V, the upcoming ESA PLATO mission, WEAVE and 4MOST.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts