Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Despite the high number of deep learning models presented in the last few years for automatically annotating medical images, clear baselines to compare model upon are still missing. Furthermore, though there are only two datasets publicly available for the task, there is neither a shared and commonly adopted procedure for preprocessing the raw data nor an unanimous way in which the intermediate tasks have been defined. The work here presented tries to fill this gap by clearly characterizing the datasets, defining the learning task and providing some baselines that can be especially helpful when trying to replicate the results in languages with less resources than those available in English.
Extended abstract, presented at the 1st International Serbian Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19-20 May 2022, Kragujevac, Serbia.
computer vision, natural language generation, image classification
computer vision, natural language generation, image classification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 12 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts