Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Abstract— In this paper, ML strategy for detecting phoney reviews is proposed. Using a range of feature engineering methodologies, this paper extends beyond the review's feature extraction technique to identify various examiner behaviours. The paper compares and contrasts the outcomes of various programmes. We compared the effectiveness of several classifiers in both cases using an actual dataset of restaurant ratings with and without factors derived from the user's activitiesWhen it comes to the f-score, the remaining classifiers have the highest f-score of 74.79 percent. According to the results. The f-score has grown by 14.14 percent after factoring behavioural characteristics of the reviewers.
feature engineering, supervised machine learning, data mining, Fake reviews
feature engineering, supervised machine learning, data mining, Fake reviews
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 1 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts