Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Value as a structure-forming economic category and as a socio-economic phenomenon is one of the most controversial topics, the definitions of which were undertaken within the framework of deductive-logical, mathematical, theoretical, empirical, subjectivist approaches (including their combination). Despite the popularity of the marginalist definition of the concept of “cost” in economics, there are still ongoing active discussions between representatives of marginalism and supporters of the theory labor cost, especially during the most acute and protracted phases of the crisis capitalist market economy. Böhm-Bawerk as the most prominent critic of the theory of labor value in his work. The Critique of Marx's Theory begins by acknowledging the popularity of Marx's ideas. Along with this, he often imputes to Marx that he is deliberately engaged in fitting facts under his theory, thereby allowing him to strengthen its conceptual design, which at the same time allowed him to adhere to his concept without in conflict with the facts. If we state as briefly as possible the essence of Böhm-Bawerk's criticism of Marx's theory of value, then all volumes of Capital (possibly for with the exception of some fragments of Volume III) are sheer sophism: “As is often the case with Marx, her (theory - N.G.) argumentation is based on a simple play on words” (Böhm-Bawerk, 2002. P. 106-107 ). The culmination of dialectical "tricks", in the words of Böhm-Bawerk, used by Marx on throughout almost all volumes of "Capital", was the tenth chapter of the third volume as a natural result of self-contradiction: “Under this sign stands tenth chapter of Marx's third volume: she brings the so belated bad the harvest that was supposed to grow out of bad sowing ”(Ibid., p. 115). By Böhm-Bawerk's remark (he emphasizes this both at the beginning of the criticism of Marx's theory of value and after its completion), this systematic error is largely associated with Marx's disregard for the empirical and economic-psychological approach to the study of value.
value, theory of value, use value, exchange value, marginalism, labor, abstract labor
value, theory of value, use value, exchange value, marginalism, labor, abstract labor
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts