Downloads provided by UsageCounts
ABSTRACT This study aims to compare the retention and wear changes between two stud attachments “Locator” and “Novaloc” used for implant supported mandibular overdenture. Two ready-made epoxy resin models represented completely edentulous patients were prepared to receive two implant analogues in the canine area and divided randomly into two groups. The first group represented the Locator attachment with its nylon matrix and metal housing; the second one was Novaloc with its PEEK matrix. Two overdentures were constructed for each group. The pick-up proceeded as conventional method. Universal testing machine was used to measure the retention of each attachment. Chewing simulator exerted multiple cycles mimicking the insertion and removal of the overdentures at the baseline, 500 cycles, 1000 cycles, 1500 cycles and 2000 cycles. Digital microscope was used to evaluate the wear behavior of each attachment during these different cyclic loading. Regarding retention was performed by using Independent t-test which revealed that retention of group I (Locator) was significantly higher (P<0.05) than group II (Novaloc) at baseline, 500 cycles, 1000 cycles, 1500 cycles and 2000 cycles. Comparison between mean difference of wear (wear changes) of both groups was performed by using Independent t-test which revealed in the overall changes group I (Locator) was significantly higher than group II (Novaloc). The Locator showed higher initial retention than Novaloc. Regarding wear behavior, Novaloc showed lesser wear and changes than Locator attachment. Keywords: Locator attachment, Novaloc attachment, Retention, Wear
Locator attachment, Novaloc attachment, Retention, Wear
Locator attachment, Novaloc attachment, Retention, Wear
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 144 | |
| downloads | 105 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts