Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Sygma
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

D2.2 BYOD Guidelines

Authors: Juty, Nick; Courtot, Melanie; Burdett, Tony; Goble, Carole; Gray, Alasdair; Evelo, Chris; Willighagen, Egon; +8 Authors

D2.2 BYOD Guidelines

Abstract

Until now, there has been no standard or generalisable process for the ‘FAIRification’ of any given dataset. As a consequence, over the course of the FAIRplus project, it was necessary to develop such a methodology so that a) any given dataset could be onboarded for FAIRification (IMI or EFPIA); b) passaged through a defined and repeatable process, and c) could be shown to be demonstrably more FAIR at the conclusion of such a process. Originally, we conceived of a process whereby a FAIRplus ‘FAIR-CMMI’ team would collaborate with IMI projects through a number of “Bring your own data” (BYOD) workshops. However, early in the project, we refined our strategy such that these teams were known as ‘squads’ and collaborated closely with IMI projects representatives on an ongoing basis, rather than in discrete one-off workshops, but otherwise executed precisely the same functions (see ‘Background’). We report here the development of a methodology, which has been iteratively refined over the lifetime of the project, to describe how the personnel responsible for the FAIRification will work, essentially providing a ‘user manual’ for those people engaged in the practical work. For the FAIRplus project we formed ‘squads’, inspired by but differing from ‘agile’ and ‘sprint’ practices. Here, we populated teams across project-organisational and reporting boundaries, based on required expertise for specific FAIRification tasks. Squads were fluid in population, with members switching as required for specific tasks, and tactically responsive, with additional teams ‘spun up’ or down as required. Squads worked in 3-monthly ‘release cycles’, targeting specific FAIRification tasks around which they would ‘swarm’. Accompanying the defined steps (e.g. inputs and outputs) of the FAIRification, we have developed a variety of checkpoints and templates to assist in developing a repeatable process. The squads have been an important mechanism in achieving FAIRplus project objectives, being heavily embedded in many major outputs, and acting as a point of contact with other FAIRification stakeholders such as RDMkit and Pistoia Alliance.

Keywords

FAIR data, FAIR Cookbook, RDMkit, FAIRplus, Innovative Medicines Initiative, Pistoia Alliance, FAIRification

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 5
    download downloads 9
  • 5
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
5
9
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities