Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16443-9_2 , 10.5281/zenodo.6762573 , 10.5281/zenodo.6672250 , 10.48550/arxiv.2206.14903 , 10.5281/zenodo.6672251
pmid: 36198166
pmc: PMC9527770
arXiv: 2206.14903
doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16443-9_2 , 10.5281/zenodo.6762573 , 10.5281/zenodo.6672250 , 10.48550/arxiv.2206.14903 , 10.5281/zenodo.6672251
pmid: 36198166
pmc: PMC9527770
arXiv: 2206.14903
We release 956 radiologist QA/QC’ed spiculation/lobulation annotations on segmented lung nodules for two public datasets, LIDC (with visual radiologist malignancy RM scores for the entire cohort and pathology-proven malignancy PM labels for a subset) and LUNGx (with pathology-proven size-matched benign/malignant nodules to remove the effect of size on malignancy prediction). We also release our multi-class Voxel2Mesh extension (available on our Clinically-Intrepretable Radiomics GitHub) to provide a good baseline for end-to-end deep learning lung nodule segmentation, peaks’ classification (lobulation/spiculation), and malignancy prediction; Voxel2Mesh is the only published method to our knowledge that preserves sharp peaks during segmentation and hence its use as our base model. The primary motivation of this work comes from our collaborators in radiology inquiring about the importance of clinically-reported LUNG-RADS features such as spiculation/lobulation in state-of-the-art deep learning malignancy prediction methods. Previous methods have performed malignancy prediction for LIDC and LUNGx datasets but without robust attribution to any clinically reported/actionable features (see extensive literature on sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters). This motivated us to annotate clinically-reported features at voxel/vertex-level on public lung nodule datasets (using our negative area distortion metric computed via spherical parameterization to annotate spiculations/lobulations on meshes followed by radiologist QA/QC) and relating these to malignancy prediction (bypassing the “flaky” attribution schemes). With the release of this comprehensively-annotated dataset, we hope that previous malignancy prediction methods can also validate their explanations and provide clinically-actionable insights. We also release our entire pipeline to generate the spiculation/lobulation annotations from scratch for LIDC/LUNGx as well as new datasets.
Accompanying GitHub repository is available here: https://github.com/nadeemlab/CIR.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Radiomics, Malignancy Prediction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Image and Video Processing (eess.IV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Image and Video Processing, Clinically-Reported Features, Clinically-Intrepretable Features, Deep Learning, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Lung Nodule, Interpretability, Medical Imaging Datasets
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Radiomics, Malignancy Prediction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Image and Video Processing (eess.IV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Image and Video Processing, Clinically-Reported Features, Clinically-Intrepretable Features, Deep Learning, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Lung Nodule, Interpretability, Medical Imaging Datasets
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 176 | |
| downloads | 88 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts