Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Modelling astroseismically known stars by searching for best-fitting models in stellar grids naturally depends on the number and precision of known stellar parameters, limiting the range of acceptable models. Here, we compare the solutions of such grid-based analyses of the seismic benchmark object 16 Cyg A+B as obtained using the approach of Nsamba et al. (2021), with an updated search including a Gaia-based luminosity (Yildiz et al. 2017). We repeat the exercise for α Cen A, the object with unknown core structure (radiative or convective; Nsamba et al. 2018), using either a parallax-based luminosity (Kervella et al. 2017) or the stellar radius as obtained from interferometry (Kervella et al. 2003) to restrict the space of possible solutions.
Stars: structure, Stars: asteroseismology, Stars: 16 Cyg, alpha Cen
Stars: structure, Stars: asteroseismology, Stars: 16 Cyg, alpha Cen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 16 | |
| downloads | 17 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts