Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The top 100 most influential articles in olfactory disorder: a bibliometric analysis

Authors: Chen, Teng-yu; Hong, Hai-yu; Li, Dan; Fang, Cai-shan; Lin, Man-qing; Rui-Zhi, Wang; Zhu, Jin-xiang; +5 Authors

The top 100 most influential articles in olfactory disorder: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Introduction: Studies on olfactory disorder have varied considerably in content and field over the past four decades. Influential publications of olfactory disorder have not been analyzed quantitatively. This study aimed to analyze the top 100 most influential articles in olfactory disorder through bibliometrics. Methods: The researchers searched the Web of Science Core Collection for publications from 1980 to August 31, 2021. The top 100 highly cited articles were screened in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The journal impact factor and the SCImago Journal Rank indicator were searched for the journal in which the top-cited articles were published. The researchers analyzed the data via Microsoft Excel and SPSS 24.0 and used VOSviewer software for data visualization. Results: The total citations of the top 100 articles have increased exponentially, especially in the past 2 years. The journal LARYNGOSCOPE contributed the most influential papers (n=6). The United States published the most top 100 articles (n=52), followed by Germany and the United Kingdom. The University of Pennsylvania published the most influential studies, with a total of 3,852 citations. Richard L. Doty and Thomas Hummel contributed the most influential literature, and the top 100 studies also cited their research frequently. The most important articles in the field of OD mainly focused on COVID-19, Parkinson's disease and olfactory tests. Conclusion: Neurodegenerative diseases and COVID-19-related olfactory disorders have been considered main topics over the past 40 years. This study identified the most influential articles for olfactory disorder researchers, providing guidance for their research.

Keywords

Parkinson disease, Bibliometrics, Olfactory disorder, COVID-19, Alzheimer's disease

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 3
  • 3
    views
    3
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
3