How social media shapes polarization

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Nov 2021 English Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Trends in Cognitive Sciences, volume 25, pages 913-916 (issn: 1364-6613,

Copyright policy )Funded by:SSHRC | unidentified

Authors: Jay J. Van Bavel; Steve Rathje; Elizabeth Harris; Claire Robertson; Anni Sternisko;

doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013 , 10.5281/zenodo.6604779 , 10.5281/zenodo.6604780

pmid: 34429255

How social media shapes polarization

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This is the accepted manuscript version of the work published in its final form as Bavel, J. J. V., Rathje, S., Harris, E., Robertson, C., & Sternisko, A. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(11), 913-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013 Deposited by shareyourpaper.org and openaccessbutton.org. We've taken reasonable steps to ensure this content doesn't violate copyright. However, if you think it does you can request a takedown by emailing help@openaccessbutton.org.

Related Organizations

Center for Neural Science
United States
University of Cambridge
United Kingdom
New York University
United States

Keywords

Politics, Humans, Social Media

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	129
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%