<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Scientific analysis of data on proposals and the decision-making procedure of the FWF with particular focus on the programme "Stand-Alone Projects" in the years 2010-2019

Name: Scientific analysis of data on proposals and the decision-making procedure of the FWF with particular focus on the programme "Stand-Alone Projects" in the years 2010-2019
Keywords: validity of funding decisions, Basic Research, 10093 Institute of Psychology, Austrian Science Fund (FWF), peer review, 11315 Center for Higher Education and Science Studies (CHESS), 370 Education, Research Assessment, 150 Psychology, funding organisation

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Report , Other literature type , External research report 01 Jan 2021Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2021 Switzerland English Publisher:Zenodo

Authors: Mutz, Rüdiger; Daniel, Hans-Dieter;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6596769 , 10.5167/uzh-232463 , 10.5281/zenodo.6596768

Scientific analysis of data on proposals and the decision-making procedure of the FWF with particular focus on the programme "Stand-Alone Projects" in the years 2010-2019

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This study follows on from the analyses of the Austrian Science Fund's (FWF) decision-making procedures for the years 1999-2009. The new study analyses the FWF Stand-Alone Projects programme for the years 2010-2019. The data basis is: 50 board meetings 10,871 funding applications 23,646 international reviews 1,582 final reports 1,317 final report reviews Based on this data, further detailed analyses will follow in the coming months and years.

Country

Switzerland

Related Organizations

University of Zurich
Switzerland

Keywords

validity of funding decisions, Basic Research, 10093 Institute of Psychology, Austrian Science Fund (FWF), peer review, 11315 Center for Higher Education and Science Studies (CHESS), 370 Education, Research Assessment, 150 Psychology, funding organisation, Research Funding, Grant Peer Review

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Usage byUsageCounts

visibility	views	318
download	downloads	183

318
views
183
downloads
Powered by

Found an issue? Give us feedback

visibility

download

Average

318

183

Green