Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Hosseini, M., Lewis, J., Zwart, H., & Gordijn, B. (2022). An Ethical Exploration of Increased\u00a0Average Number of Authors Per Publication. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00352-3", "Hosseini, M., & Gordijn, B. (2020). A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship. Accountability in Research, 27(5), 284\u2013324. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1750957"]}
This presentation summarized a paper published in May 2022 in the journal of Science and Engineering Ethics: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-021-00352-3
Scholarly authorship, Authorship inflation, Authorship ethics, Research integrity, Publication ethics
Scholarly authorship, Authorship inflation, Authorship ethics, Research integrity, Publication ethics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 59 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts