Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Multiple formulations and technologies for vaccinating against SARS-CoV-2 exist but how the use of these in homologous or heterologous format impacts immunogenicity is far from clear. Here the authors compare a range of heterologous and homologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination strategies and assess the induced humoral and cellular immune response. The following heterologous and homologous vaccination regimens were tested for immunogenicity and reactogenicity in a in a convenience cohort of 331 healthy individuals. ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 followed by BNT162b2 (n=66) ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 followed by mRNA-1273 (n=101) BNT162b2 followed by BNT162b2 (n=43) mRNA-1273 followed by mRNA-1273 (n=59) ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 followed by ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 (n=62)
{"references": ["Klemis et al. (2021) DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1034243/v1"]}
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, vaccination, heterologous, mix and match
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, vaccination, heterologous, mix and match
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 18 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts