Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Identification of M. ornata and M. phoebe based on underside wing morphology and antennae Identification of individual museum specimens of ornata and phoebe may never be achieved with 100% accuracy; although there are morphological features to accommodate identification in many cases, accurate identification requires an examination of their respective late instar larvae. However, the shape of the submarginal markings on the wing undersides and the tips of the antenna usually provides a very good indication of species, particularly when there is a series of syntypes from the same population, taken at the same time (cf. Tóth & Varga, 2011: appendix only; Russell et al. 2020). These differences can be seen on figures 1–4, which show the undersides of male specimens from two sympatric and partially synchronic populations of M. ornata and M. phoebe from the Southern Urals, Russian Federation and females from similar populations near Rakitovec, Slovenia. Identifications of M. telona and M. phoebe abbas were based solely on morphometric measurements of genitalia and the biochemical results of Tóth et al. (2014, 2016 & 2017). DNA analysis has confirmed the specific status of M. telona and is widely regarded as a tool for the reliable separation of closely related species. However, it is not definitive, as exemplified by the similarity of the results of the analysis of the COI gene in M. ornata and M. phoebe from western populations. Also DNA analysis has so far been unable to separate M. phoebe from M. sibina Alphéraky, 1881 (Lukhtanov et al., 2009; Leneveu et al., 2009; Tóth et al. 2014), whilst differences in their wing morphology are distinctive.
Published as part of Russell, Peter J. C., Lukhtanov, Vladimir A. & Tennent, W. John, 2022, Reassessment of the status of some European and Asian Melitaea taxa described as subspecies of Melitaea phoebe ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775), with designations of lectotypes where appropriate (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), pp. 25-38 in Zootaxa 5141 (1) on page 26, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6577627
Lepidoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Nymphalidae, Melitaea ornata, Biodiversity, Melitaea, Taxonomy
Lepidoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Nymphalidae, Melitaea ornata, Biodiversity, Melitaea, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts