Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Melitaea ornata Christoph 1893

Authors: Russell, Peter J. C.; Lukhtanov, Vladimir A.; Tennent, W. John;

Melitaea ornata Christoph 1893

Abstract

Identification of M. ornata and M. phoebe based on underside wing morphology and antennae Identification of individual museum specimens of ornata and phoebe may never be achieved with 100% accuracy; although there are morphological features to accommodate identification in many cases, accurate identification requires an examination of their respective late instar larvae. However, the shape of the submarginal markings on the wing undersides and the tips of the antenna usually provides a very good indication of species, particularly when there is a series of syntypes from the same population, taken at the same time (cf. Tóth & Varga, 2011: appendix only; Russell et al. 2020). These differences can be seen on figures 1–4, which show the undersides of male specimens from two sympatric and partially synchronic populations of M. ornata and M. phoebe from the Southern Urals, Russian Federation and females from similar populations near Rakitovec, Slovenia. Identifications of M. telona and M. phoebe abbas were based solely on morphometric measurements of genitalia and the biochemical results of Tóth et al. (2014, 2016 & 2017). DNA analysis has confirmed the specific status of M. telona and is widely regarded as a tool for the reliable separation of closely related species. However, it is not definitive, as exemplified by the similarity of the results of the analysis of the COI gene in M. ornata and M. phoebe from western populations. Also DNA analysis has so far been unable to separate M. phoebe from M. sibina Alphéraky, 1881 (Lukhtanov et al., 2009; Leneveu et al., 2009; Tóth et al. 2014), whilst differences in their wing morphology are distinctive.

Published as part of Russell, Peter J. C., Lukhtanov, Vladimir A. & Tennent, W. John, 2022, Reassessment of the status of some European and Asian Melitaea taxa described as subspecies of Melitaea phoebe ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775), with designations of lectotypes where appropriate (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), pp. 25-38 in Zootaxa 5141 (1) on page 26, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6577627

Related Organizations
Keywords

Lepidoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Nymphalidae, Melitaea ornata, Biodiversity, Melitaea, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 1
  • 2
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
1
Green
Related to Research communities