Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Melitaea phoebe subsp. amanica , Rebel 1917

Authors: Russell, Peter J. C.; Lukhtanov, Vladimir A.; Tennent, W. John;

Melitaea phoebe subsp. amanica , Rebel 1917

Abstract

M. phoebe amanica Rebel, 1917 [TL: Kushdjula, Taurus Mountains; Das Dagh, Amanus Mountains, Hatay, Turkey]; syntypic material consists of a single male and two females in the Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, each having a red ‘type’ label. Hesselbarth et al. (1995: 2, 1031) and van Oorschot & Coutsis (2014: 63) synonymised this subspecies with M. phoebe punica telona and M. telona, respectively; the present authors certainly consider that this subspecies belongs to either M. ornata or M. telona rather than M. phoebe. Tóth et al. (2014) demonstrated that M. telona was present in Lebanon, to the South of the Nur mountain range and Russell & Pateman (2012) reared an egg batch from a female captured at Tuzlabeli geçidi, Muðla, western Turkey and demonstrated from the L4+ larval head colour that the population there was not M. phoebe but M. ornata. The first author considers that the specimens should probably be associated with M. telona but further DNA analysis is required to confirm to which species they belong. In order that this subspecific name can be in future firmly associated with a species we hereby formally designate the male specimen as lectotype for M. phoebe amanica Rebel, 1917. From figures 13A, B it can be seen that this specimen has the wing morphological characters typical of both M. ornata and M. telona rather than those of M. phoebe. The labels on the specimen pin (Fig. 13C) are as follows: (1) on white paper handwritten in black “Taurus/ Kushdjula/ 22.V.14”; (2) on white paper handwritten in black “ phoebe / amanica / Type [in red] Rbl”; (3) on white card typed in black “Misident:/ Melitaea telona, Russell 2021 ”; (4) on red paper typed in black “ LECTOTYPE / Melitaea phoebe amanica / REBEL, 1917 / designated Russell &/ Gaal-Haszler 2021”.

Published as part of Russell, Peter J. C., Lukhtanov, Vladimir A. & Tennent, W. John, 2022, Reassessment of the status of some European and Asian Melitaea taxa described as subspecies of Melitaea phoebe ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775), with designations of lectotypes where appropriate (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), pp. 25-38 in Zootaxa 5141 (1) on page 32, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6577627

Related Organizations
Keywords

Lepidoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Melitaea phoebe, Animalia, Nymphalidae, Biodiversity, Melitaea, M. phoebe amanica rebel, 1917, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
  • 4
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
Green
Related to Research communities