Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Quali sono i criteri che gli esperti considerano come i più importanti per attestare la comunicazione scientifica online? Abbiamo condotto uno studio Delphi per raccogliere la loro opinione. Lo studio si è svolto in due fasi, con 26 (fase 1) e 19 (fase 2) studiosi di comunicazione scientifica di tutto il mondo e ha portato all'individuazione di 12 criteri di qualità per la comunicazione scientifica online.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts